Archive for 07:17 PM

Walking in a demographic winter wonderland

07:17 PM

By Jennifer Roback Morse

Why are people averting their eyes from the coming collapse of population growth?

Demographic Winter is an independently produced film describing the consequences of the population collapse of industrialized countries. I have been amazed at the response, or I should say, lack of response to this film. Many of the reviewers either dismissed the thesis of the film, or changed the subject. The lack of serious American attention is surprising, considering that Demographic Winter has been translated in several languages, most recently, Romanian. (Full disclosure: I was interviewed as one of the experts for Part II, as yet to be released.) Commentators Left and Right are wandering through a Demographic Winter Wonderland with their eyes glazed over.

The film argues that falling population will mean a diminished quality of life for the aging generation and for future generations. For instance, pensions, both private and public, have to be paid for. When the retired population is too high relative to the working population, paying the promised pensions becomes an enormous burden. Either the young pay crushing taxes, or the elderly will not get what they expected, or both.

Consumer spending keeps the economy humming and the stock market climbing. When population shrinks, the demand for goods and services of all kinds shrinks. Harry Dent, one of the experts interviewed on the film, is an investment advisor. He discovered the significance of population growth by accident. He had a chart showing birth rates over a hundred year period on his desk next to a chart showing the stock market over the same period. He laid them over each other and realized that the stock market tracks birth rates with about a 40 year lag. That is because people spend the most money in their 40s. They buy the biggest house they’ll ever have; they feed, clothe and educate their children; they buy cars and vacations.

I have been thinking about Harry Dent and his charts while I drive through my San Diego neighborhood. Out of 42 homes, we have 4 foreclosures. Yes, the housing prices ballooned up and people took on mortgages they couldn’t pay. But there is more to the story than the credit crunch: there simply are not enough people at the right age, with enough income, to afford these houses. Because the Baby Boomers didn’t replace themselves, there are not enough people to buy their homes. Falling demand translates into falling home prices.

The Chattering Classes can not bring themselves to take the Demographic Winter thesis seriously. The Left dismisses it as a hysterical racist rant. Kathryn Joyce, writing in the Nation magazine, reports on her conversation with Stephen Mosher. “Mosher, president of the Catholic anticontraception lobbyist group (cue scary music) Population Research Institute (PRI), describes his grim vision of Europe’s future: fields will lie fallow and economies will wither. A great depression will sink over the continent as it undergoes ‘a decline that Europe hasn’t experienced since the Black Death.’”

Joyce never refutes Mosher’s argument that population decline precedes economic decline. Instead, she changes the subject to something she wants to talk about: the alleged racism of pro-natalists. “The white Christian West, in this telling, is in danger of forfeiting itself through sheer lack of numbers to an onslaught of Muslim immigrants and their purportedly numerous offspring.”

Oddly enough, the Demographic Winter film makes no mention of race or nationality. In fact, the film emphasizes that the problem of population decline is a worldwide problem. Nobel Prize winning economist Gary Becker notes that 70 countries now have fertility rates below replacement. The left-wing commentariat would like the film to be about race, so they can dismiss it as unworthy of attention.

Representing the Libertarian Right, we have Ronald Bailey of Reason magazine. He likewise makes no pretense of engaging the actual argument of the film: “I doubt that the “demographic winter” portends economic collapse or social deterioration, but let us set that aside for this column, and instead ask why people are choosing to have fewer children?” He wants to talk about how the modern world has given men and women more choices, which is a good thing.

His libertarian instincts blind him to the fact that the Invisible Hand does not always promote the social good. Having children may be optional for individuals, but it is not optional for society as a whole. The principles of individual liberty and personal choice that he holds dear are not self-sustaining. Those ideals will collapse, if the people who hold them do not transmit them to the next generation. In this case, we are not even creating a next generation.

As I mentioned, the producers of Demographic Winter interviewed me to appear in Part II. The producers happen to be Mormons. They told me that they had anticipated more interest in the film from church groups of all kinds. But in fact, only Catholics and their fellow Mormons seem receptive.

This is not entirely surprising, in that these two groups have theological reasons for supporting larger families. But still, churches and all of civil society, ought to take the argument of Demographic Winter seriously.

Jennifer Roback Morse, PhD is an economist and the Founder and President of the Ruth Institute, a nonprofit educational organization devoted to bringing hope and encouragement for lifelong married love.

Bookmark and Share

Sorting out the financial storm

10:24 PM

 

From the December 10, 2008 Weekly Standard Online

by Jaime Daremblum

Recent events suggest that Barack Obama will be facing a veritable perfect storm of challenges in Latin America. The death toll in Mexico’s war on drugs is mounting. The future of Plan Colombia, which began as a U.S.-backed anti-drug initiative, is uncertain. Argentina may be on the verge of yet another economic collapse. The global financial crisis is affecting countries throughout the region. Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez is attempting to remove the constitutional limits on his power and is using his oil wealth to fund anti-American populists. Chávez is also pursuing a strategic partnership with Iran. In Nicaragua, the ruling Sandinista party stole recent municipal elections and has been harassing the opposition. In Cuba, the island’s Communist rulers are trying to preserve a creaking dictatorship and squash hopes of democratic transition.

Meanwhile, Russian and Chinese influence in Latin America is growing. In late November, Russian warships arrived in Venezuela for a series of military exercises. The Russian fleet included a nuclear cruiser. As the Guardian noted, “It was Moscow’s first show of naval force in the region since the Cold War.”

How will Obama respond? Unfortunately, Latin America got little airtime during the 2008 presidential campaign, so we don’t know much about his plans for the region. We do know that Obama routinely criticized free trade and opposed the FTA with Colombia. We also know that he promised to increase U.S. economic aid to Latin America.

Regional officials are hoping that his anti-trade posturing was just campaign rhetoric. As for boosting development assistance, the financial crisis and a U.S. recession will probably scuttle that idea. Obama also famously pledged to meet with Chávez and Cuban President Raúl Castro “without preconditions.” He has since backtracked from that promise.

Obama is taking office at a critical moment in Latin American history. After a lengthy stretch of strong GDP growth, the region must deal with the headwinds of a global financial crisis and economic downturn. The massive drop in oil prices has eroded Chávez’s petro-power, at least temporarily. But Venezuela is moving to enhance its economic and security cooperation with Russia and China.

According to a recent Moscow Times article, “the volume of trade between Russia and Latin America has been growing at a clip of 25 percent to 30 percent annually.” The Russian-Venezuelan war games highlight their burgeoning defense ties. In September, Chávez traveled to Beijing and purchased two dozen K-8 military aircraft. During the same visit, Venezuela and China agreed to expand their energy cooperation. As Agence France-Presse reported, “Caracas provides 500,000 barrels of oil per day to Beijing, a trade expected to grow to one million barrels a day by 2012.”

The presidents of both Russia and China recently toured Latin America. Russian President Dmitry Medvedev met with Chávez in Caracas. The two leaders reached several agreements on energy, economic, and military collaboration, including a pact that will help Venezuela develop its own civilian nuclear program. Medvedev also stopped in Peru, Brazil, and Cuba. He was in Peru for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, as was Chinese President Hu Jintao, who declared that “China and South America have already become extremely good friends and partners.” Hu also traveled to Cuba, where he signed economic accords, met with both Raúl and Fidel Castro, and spoke of the friendship between the Cuban and Chinese peoples. As the Associated Press noted, China is Cuba’s second largest trading partner (after Venezuela), with annual bilateral trade eclipsing $2.6 billion, and Chinese trade with all of Latin America increased from $10 billion in 2000 to $103 billion in 2007.

China seems eager to expand its trade relations throughout the region. One hopes that U.S. lawmakers are paying attention. The U.S.-Colombia FTA remains stuck in Congress, as does the U.S.-Panama FTA. Their approval would send the right message to Latin American officials. Obama claims he is committed to the region. But will he endorse the Colombia and Panama deals?

Closer to home, Obama will have to coordinate anti-drug activities with Mexican authorities. The drug war in Mexico has become increasingly violent, with horrific bloodshed plaguing many Mexican border towns. As the Washington Post reported, Mexico’s drug war “has claimed more than 4,500 lives since President Felipe Calderón unleashed the army and police against the cartels and corrupt officials in early 2007.”

Despite its worsening drug problem, Mexico has experienced strong economic growth in recent years, and President Calderón has championed important reforms. The same can be said of Colombia and its president, Alvaro Uribe. But now both countries are dealing with fallout from the global financial crisis. Colombia has seen massive reductions in all types of violence under President Uribe, yet it is still plagued by drug trafficking. Obama will have to work with Bogotá to determine the future of Plan Colombia, a U.S.-funded military aid program that began under President Clinton as an anti-drug initiative and now includes anti-terrorism assistance.

Thanks to their recent economic reforms, most Latin American countries are in a relatively good position to address the financial turmoil. But one country that may be on the brink of an economic disaster is Argentina, whose last meltdown occurred in 2001. The Argentine government made way too many spending commitments when commodity prices were sky-high; now that they have fallen dramatically, Buenos Aires is in a fiscal crunch. As the Economist reports, Argentina “must repay $23 billion of expiring bonds over the next two years that it cannot roll over because investors fear Argentina may be heading for another debt default and are demanding a prohibitive interest rate.”

If all that were not enough, Obama must also contend with the erosion of democracy in Nicaragua and Iran’s creeping influence in Venezuela. Chávez has embraced Iran as a strategic partner, and there is evidence that Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed terrorist group, may be reaping the benefits. The U.S.

Treasury Department has accused the Venezuelan government of “employing and providing safe harbor to Hezbollah facilitators and fundraisers.” The Los Angeles Times has reported that Western anti-terrorism officials fear Hezbollah is now “using Venezuela as a base for operations.” Last month, a Venezuelan state-run media outlet said that Tehran and Caracas are launching a new program at Venezuela’s Bolivarian University that will educate students in “21st-century socialism,” as Chávez calls his brand of politics.

Most of Latin America has enjoyed a lengthy period of economic and political progress, which should be celebrated. Broadly speaking, the region is in relatively good shape. But there could be turbulent times ahead. While Obama will probably devote most of his foreign policy attention to the Middle East and Asia, he won’t be able to ignore the many challenges in Latin America.

Ambassador Jaime Daremblum is a senior fellow with Hudson Institute and directs the Center for Latin American Studies.

(more…)

Bookmark and Share